Church

Duplicates

On about three separate occasions since the Advent of Google Photos, I have uploaded my entire extant photo library to that service. I’ve done this each time in the confidence that duplicate photos would not be imported.

How wrong I have been.

I stand before you today as a man with a Google Photos library that is an absolute wreck of duplicate (and sometimes triplicate and quadruplicate) pictures that are incorrectly timestamped. The hours I have spent working to rectify this–it’s embarrassing to admit.

I’m battling opposing negative possibilities. On the one hand, I could delete photos I take to be replications and be wrong, thereby wiping out the only copies that exist. I’ve protected against this by backing up the entire thing on an old iPod classic. But still, especially when the pictures feature people no longer living, my index finger trembles over the “delete” button. On the other hand, I could permit this photographic stew to simmer indefinitely, making a nostalgic sip of my photo timeline a bitter mouthful of memories not where they should be, and not where they should be, and NOT WHERE THEY SHOULD BE.

What is a photo for, anyway? For memory. And what is memory for? To re-live moments exactly as they happened, to prove to myself that, yes, I once had a full head of hair and that the 11 year-old who frequently rampages through my apartment could once be held in the palm of a single hand? No, memory’s best use is as a catalyst for present growth, a spur to keep becoming the person my favorite photos show me to be. That person is most often not in the picture, but has the attention focused on an object of admiration, awe, or devotion. Memory should expand those.

I think I am starting to prefer the risk of deletion to the risk of duplication. The photo is not the memory. The photo is not the person.

Standard

2 thoughts on “Duplicates

  1. Rocky, thank you. Some of my favorite descriptions in my diary are of adventures with my camera, back when it was not part of my phone. The anticipation of getting the photo back, the sheer joy of “This was so beautiful that I want a picture to remember it by, and I took one,” and just the lack of the instant photo all combined to throw me back on the tools I had: the words I could use to provoke the image in my mind’s eye. (Of course, that’s why one cabinet in my apartment is a private bookshelf full of diaries, and I had a very cooling thought the other day as I started volume two for 2019.) Duplicating those? Oh nooo!

  2. Donna Supinget says:

    I was cleaning today and came across a Polaroid of Your dad before we were married. It brought back a host of memories that we hadn’t thought of for years. Don’t risk deletion. You never know what you’d be losing.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s