More people involved is better. More people invested in a project means more ownership players will take over the outcome which means less top-down dictatorial leadership.
Only, when we’re making something new, does it actually work like that?
Joe has an idea for a service project at his church. He wants to support kids at a low-income school in town by providing backpacks filled with school supplies at the start of the school year. He’s talked to the school, and they’re on board.
So, choose your own adventure here. You’re Joe. You want to put a call out in your church for people to work with you on it, so you’re going to make an announcement in worship. Does your announcement say, “If you want to be part of this let me know,” or does it say something more like, “Here’s how to sign up to help” and include a list of specific tasks people can volunteer to complete?
Choice A is a path toward open-ended collaboration with anyone who heard your call and felt compelled to respond. The major decisions about how to accomplish the project are on the table for the whole team. In fact, the nature of the project may even change.
Choice B is a you calling the shots and assigning responsibility for particular pieces.
As church leaders, are we encouraging people with ideas more toward path A or B? And which one are we actually taking with our own ministry ideas?