The Gospel Is Not At Stake. It’s Just Not.

I’ll finish up my NEXT Retrospect series tomorrow, because today I want to say something about the World Vision controversy.

If you haven’t been following, World Vision announced earlier this week that it would lift its ban on hiring Christians in legal same gender marriages. Supporters reacted swiftly and vigorously, accusing World Vision of everything from harming children to not believing the Bible to trivializing the cross. Many supporters either threatened to pull child sponsorships directly or speculated that lots of people would (in one of those predictions meant to bring about the thing it predicts).

Amid that wash of evangelical furor, bloggers like Rachel Held Evans defended World Vision and gaped at the pitch of its now disillusioned supporters. Evans even urged people to sponsor a child through World Vision who never had before.

Now World Vision has reversed course and asked for its supporters forgiveness for what it is calling a mistake. 

In a statement that sounds like it was written at gunpoint, World Vision President Richard Stearns said

“What we are affirming today is there are certain beliefs that are so core to our Trinitarian faith that we must take a strong stand on those beliefs. We cannot defer to a small minority of churches and denominations that have taken a different position.”

Clearly, threatening to abandon children in poverty works. An international evangelical aid organization cannot hope to survive if the John Pipers and Franklin Grahams of the world are against it. In a culture that disdains clerical authority, these men function as the closest thing evangelicalism has to a pope, and their public denunciations are utterly damning. They know that.

But they’re wrong. They’re not just wrong in their threats and their contempt for gay people, but they’re wrong in their belief that the gospel is at stake in these disputes over sexuality.

It’s not.

It’s just not.

I’ve written about the gospel here, and what I want to say about it now is that it is both the good news about God’s salvation for all of creation in the life, death, and resurrection of Jesus and the good news of liberty for captives and sight for the blind that Jesus himself preached and called “gospel.” Neither of those things are threatened by a posture of acceptance towards same gender romantic relationships.

Is something critical at stake here? Yes. But not the gospel.

Evangelical leaders have chained their understanding of the good news of salvation to an edifice of Biblical literalism. That’s what is at stake in the church’s understanding of same gender affections–the fervent belief that, unless you uncritically import patriarchal, idolatry-fearing, and misogynistic Biblical prohibitions against same-gender sex into a contemporary setting full of committed, faithful same gender romantic relationships, you have no part in Jesus. What’s at stake is a posture that makes the whole of our “Trinitarian faith” hinge upon a context-free interpretation of seven passages of scripture.

Progressives make the same mistake when we claim that the gospel is at stake unless the church unconditionally accept homosexuality. That’s because both evangelicals and progressives have far less power than we think to put the gospel at stake. The gospel is gospel: good news– news. An announcement–that the oppressed are delivered, the last are first, the poor are made rich, the kingdom of God has come near, the dividing lines between Jew and Greek, male and female, slave and free have all been overcome in God’s triumph of reconciliation over sin and death. That good news is not at stake in disagreements over homosexuality.

The church’s witness to the gospel is at stake, for sure. And here evangelical leaders have just done serious harm to the church’s witness to the gospel, and not just because they forcibly stomped down the humanity of gay people and held hungry children at gunpoint. But also because, more than the good news of little children being welcome and outcasts brought back in and the sick made well, these leaders have witnessed to the efficacy of bullying and financial threats to get what you want. That’s a witness to something, but it ain’t the gospel.

In reversing its decision, World Vision is equating truth and goodness with the volume of the majority. That, too, is a witness, although, again, not to the gospel.



11 thoughts on “The Gospel Is Not At Stake. It’s Just Not.

  1. Rocky…you have named this what it is, people in perceived positions of power bullying others to cow-tow to their position. What is so utterly disappointing and sad is that some Christians feel it is their inherent right to hijack the Gospel to serve THEM and their agenda and not Jesus and certainly not others. And for Richard Sterns and his board to make this important of a decision and then cave to public pressure less than 24 hours later is mind-boggling. Where is the courage of your convictions? Apparently made of Jell-o (my apologies to Jell-o). I sponsor a WV child and no matter what these so-called leaders do, I will not cancel my sponsorship. Ismael is counting on me. May God be with Rich and WV as they try to pick up the pieces.

  2. It sickens me to know that about 5,000 sponsors pulled their sponsorships when the initial announcement was made. I guess the children are prioritized somewhere below people’s moral outrage. In the reversal, the Gay community has not been flooding world vision with calls to threaten a boycott. Which community has demonstrated grace in this situation? Someone famous said, “they will know you are my disciples by the way you love one another.” How has the Christian community showed love to their brothers and sisters at World Vision? By calling for resignations and pulling their funds! The leadership at World Vision in reversing their decision has just shown the world that convictions take a back seat to financial concerns. There are no winners here. Regardless about how a Christian feels about Gay marriage, human sexual orientation or whatever, there is a clear mandate from the Savior that judgment is God’s alone and unconditional (agape) of our neighbor (even those we may label as our enemy) is the way of the disciple.

  3. This makes me wonder how to love and minister to the people who are entrenched in an opinion like that? Things like anti-birthcontrol or abortions…as well as rejection of same gender relationships (married or not!)

    Sexuality has been used as a power struggle for always. Christ himself as represented in the bible had very little to say about it.

    It is very traditional to use sexuality to control people through guilt. I wonder how many of those buying into this game even realize that they are doing it. Some must… Some don’t.

    I’m am at a loss for how to lovingly respond to friends and family about the issue. Stony silence? Quick change of subject? Not really moment to be proud of

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s